What changed (and why it matters for property investors)
Two measures were particularly salient for investors:
1) Negative gearing changes (residential focus)
Proposed reforms to negative gearing for established residential property may reduce the relative after-tax appeal of some residential strategies, particularly those that rely more heavily on tax settings to support returns. For investors, the key implication is comparative: if established residential after-tax outcomes become less attractive, some investors may place greater weight on other asset classes. In that context, commercial property may warrant closer consideration, particularly where return profiles are supported by income and leasing fundamentals rather than reliance on tax settings to enhance outcomes.
2) Capital gains tax (CGT)
Proposed changes to CGT may diminish the after-tax payoff from capital gains for some investors, which may increase the relative appeal of strategies supported by current income rather than purely back-ended appreciation.
However, the implications for commercial property investors are more nuanced. While proposed changes to negative gearing are focused on residential property and do not directly affect the deductibility of income from commercial assets, commercial investors may be exposed to the changes in CGT. In addition, many private investors hold commercial property through discretionary trusts, where forthcoming tax changes may further influence after-tax outcomes.
For property trusts in particular, part of the income distributed can be tax deferred, which reduces the cost base over time and can shift a portion of returns into capital gains. This means overall outcomes may still depend meaningfully on CGT treatment at disposal.
As a result, while income-oriented strategies may become relatively more attractive, any reduction in the CGT discount could still weigh on total returns for some commercial property investors, depending on structure and the balance between income and capital growth.
The impact won’t be uniform: two investors can hold the same asset and experience different net outcomes. Investors may wish to assess exposure at the structure level (individual, company, trust, SMSF, etc.) and seek advice where appropriate.