The future of franking credit refunds
The proposed changes to franking credit refunds are sparking intense debate amongst Australian investors, particularly retirees and SMSF members. With a federal election just around the corner, now is a good time to consider the role that franking credits and franking credit refunds play in your portfolio.
A brief history of franking credits
Most investors with exposure to the Australian share market will be aware of the franking credit or dividend imputation system, which was introduced to prevent company profits from being taxed twice. Before the system was introduced, companies would pay tax on their profits, and when this profit was passed to shareholders, they would be taxed a second time on the same profit.
In 1987, a rebate was introduced for those who paid tax on dividends that they received, taken off their tax in the form of a credit to be used on any other tax owed that year.
‘Fully-franked’ dividends were marked only where the full tax on profits had been paid by a company. As a result, fully-franked dividends became sought after, as they carried with them the greatest franking credits.
In 2001, the government enacted changes which resulted in franking credits being paid out in cash to shareholders who didn’t have enough, or any, tax to offset.
In 2007, the ‘Simplified Superannuation’ reform made super benefits, paid from a taxed source, tax free for people aged 60 and over.
Superannuation withdrawals also became tax free, and were no longer classified as ‘taxable income’ and because of the previous changes six years earlier, many retirees found themselves untaxed while also receiving imputation refund cheques from the government.
Eight years later, the 2015 Treasury tax discussion paper warned the government of ‘revenue concerns’ about the dividend imputation system. While the cost of imputation credits was $550 million in 2001, the report outlined they were set to cost $5 billion in 2018.
Franking credits: tax benefits and cash refunds (for now)
Franking credits have been a particularly active feature for most listed companies since the 2001 changes, with 184 companies on the S&P/ASX 200 paying some form of dividend in the past year. About half of these paid fully-franked dividends, a quarter paid partially-franked dividends and around a quarter paid unfranked dividends1.
For many Australian investors, the tax offset features of franking credits have been an incentive to invest in the local share market. For some retirees, who do not have a tax bill to offset, the ability to earn additional income from their excess credits, via a cash refund, has been an important consideration in their investment and retirement plans.
Self-managed super funds with investments in franked shares have also been able to use franking credits to offset fund expenses if they satisfied the holding period rules. In retirement (pension) phase when the fund is exempt from tax, the fund would also receive a refund for its franking credits.
Potential future changes
According to the Australian Electoral Commission, the next Federal Election must take place by 18 May 20192. If its proposed reforms are successfully legislated, Labor will effectively unwind the decision that introduced cash refunds for excess franking credits.
Franking credits will still be used to reduce tax payments, but the proposed changes would mean that taxpayers will no longer be able to obtain cash refunds for excess credits if they exceed tax liabilities (currently equating to a full refund for investors with no tax liability).
The policy will only apply to individuals and superannuation funds, and not to bodies such as registered charities and not-for-profit organisations. Union bodies, as registered charities, have effectively been exempted.
Additionally, most industry and retail superannuation funds have significant tax liabilities due to large numbers of members in accumulation stage. The funds do not currently receive refunds as they don’t have an excess of credits. The policy therefore, while applying to them, will not impact them practically.
Investment funds and listed companies holding franking credits are also likely to be impacted. Some organisations have already initiated sell-offs and special dividend repayments to their shareholders in a bid to get ahead of the potential change.
There is little doubt older independent investors will be most exposed – as they are most likely to receive franking credits in the form of cash refunds, which then contribute to their income stream. Professor Deborah Ralston, Chairperson of the SMSF Association provides the example that around 70% of taxpayers who rely on shares as their preferred savings vehicle over the age of 75 receive franking credits, with an average annual value of $6,300.
Retirees with SMSFs are likely to be impacted in a similar way. The SMSF Association estimates that it will cut around $5,000 of income from the median SMSF in retirement phase earning around $50,000 per year in pension income with a 40% allocation in Australian shares.
Most of the tax-raising benefits of the proposal fall on retired individuals and SMSFs. To combat the accusation that these individuals have been unfairly singled out, a Pensioner Guarantee exemption has been proposed for recipients of a full or part aged care pensioner, and people on other allowances such as carers, pensioners, disability support, unemployed and parenting payments. This means SMSFs with at least one exempt person, would also be exempt.
It should be noted that Labor has also proposed reducing the Capital Gains Tax discount from 50% to 25%, which will apply to all investments, and also introducing a 30% tax rate for family trusts. If you believe you may be impacted by any of these changes you should seek professional financial advice.
Tax-deferred distributions are a key feature of property funds but they are generally not well understood. Here’s a snapshot of how they work.
The regular income payments property funds distribute to investors are mostly derived from rental income earned by the property or properties within the fund. Investors pay income tax on the distributions they then receive.
Commonly the distribution payments contain a ‘tax-deferred’ component. This component is the result of differences between the earnings of the fund (rental income) and taxable income. The fund’s taxable income may be less than the actual earnings due to deductions available on depreciable elements of the underlying physical asset.
The deductions can be for items such as depreciation on the base building and fitout, as well as capital allowances and the costs of raising equity and establishing the debt facility. Generally the newer the asset the higher the depreciation amount.
Rather than paying tax on the tax-deferred component in the year of the distribution at your marginal tax rate, the tax-deferred component is generally not immediately assessable.
Instead of being taxable in the financial year the income is received, the ‘tax-deferred’ component amounts reduce the investor’s cost base in the investment, effectively deferring the tax due until a capital gains tax event is realised (like the sale of the investment).
If this event occurs when the investor has a reduced or marginal tax rate, for example after they have retired, the tax they are liable for is less than would otherwise have been the case. An additional consideration is that the capital gains discount may also apply if an investor holds the investment for 12 months or more.
(1) Data from IRESS, 52 weeks to 19 April 2018
The proposed changes to franking credit refunds discussed in this article are subject to the outcome of the upcoming federal election and/or any subsequent changes in policy. The information contained in this article is not intended to provide investment or financial advice, is for general use only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. For further information on imputation and franking credits, please contact your professional adviser/s.